Fall Retreat
Description:
The members of Cohort 4b
attended a retreat in Big Bear, CA. The retreat allows the members of cohort 4b
to get to get to know each other, learn how to work effectively and together as
a group, get to know staff members, and learn more about ourselves as leaders.
Term: Fall 2011
Learning Domains: Personal Development
Learning Outcomes
SWiBAT: identify five
people and their top three strengths.
SWiBAT: memorize all the
members’ names in my cohort.
Assessment Rubric
SLOs
|
Advanced
|
Competent
|
Basic
|
Need Improvement
|
SLO #1
Student will be able to identify
five people and their top three strengths
|
Student was able to identify five
people, their top three strengths, and one way how each student utilizes one
of their strengths
|
Student was able to identify five people and their top three
strengths
|
Student was able to identify five
people, but no their strengths
|
Student was not able to identify
five people and their top three strengths
|
SLO #2
Student will be able to memorize
15 names from the cohort
|
Student was able to memorize 20 or
more names from the cohort
|
Student was able to memorize 15 names from the cohort
|
Student memorized 10 names from
the cohort
|
Student was able to memorize 5
names from the cohort
|
Evidence
![]() |
In deep thought writing about the roles that we have. |
![]() |
Group Picture |
Reflection
The 2-day retreat was a
great experience. I got a chance to meet the professors and classmates
from Cohort 4b (Monday’s group). Based upon the assessment, I would be
Competent. We had to do an activity based upon the Strengths
Finder test. Each of us had to say our name, discuss our five
strengths and their weaknesses. As everyone talked about their strengths,
the different conversations gave us a chance to know each better. When we
left the retreat, I was able to recall five people and their strengths.
It was easier to memorize people who had the same or similar strengths.
It is important to
know the names of the people you will be with for the next two years; one of my
goals was to try to memorize everyone’s name. Leaving Big Bear, I could
honestly say I memorized at least 15 names within those two days. There
was about 24 students total, so it wasn't easy. When we would play games
or do class activities, I would make an effort to say someone’s name or quietly
go around in a circle and see if I remember everyone’s names. The names I
did remember were people I worked with in groups, on the food committee, or
stayed in the same cabin.
After this retreat, I
would need to continue to know the members of my cohort by talking to them more
and putting a name to their face.
Challenge
Description: EDAD 521 is about the history of Higher
Education. We not only learned about different eras, key events, policies, etc,
but we analyzed how history impacted Higher Education and based on history how
did we get to where we are now and what the future of education will look like.
Semester: Fall
2011
Learning Domains:
Education, Social Justice & Advocacy, Assessment & Evaluation
Learning Outcomes:
SWiBAT: Discuss the history of higher education and show how
history impacts higher education today
Assessment Rubric
Advanced
|
Competent
|
Basic
|
Need Improvement
|
|
SLO #1
Discussed history of higher education and showed how history impacts
higher education today
|
Discussed history of higher education and showed how history impacts
higher education today AND the in the future
|
Discussed history of higher education and
showed how history impacts higher education today
|
Discussed the history of higher education
|
Did not discuss the history of higher education
|
Reflection:
For my midterm in Dr. Beckham’s
class, I received 59/100. I will not forget that day. I remember turning the
through the pages and seeing all of the markings of incorrect and incomplete
answers and I finally get to the last page to view my grade and I failed. I
looked around the class and saw other students crying, frustrated, and upset
over their grade. I got up out of my seat and walked out with tears in my eyes.
I just couldn't believed I failed I test that I could honestly say I studied
for.
As I went back to class and talked
with other student who did well, I was able to see where I went wrong. I also
went to walk with the professor to see what I need to do to improve. Since the
class focal point is History of Higher Education, I know I needed a better
understanding of the history, but not only memorize dates and events; but have
to synthesize and make connections.
As I studied for my final exam, I
made sure I could not only answer the questions from the study guide, but also
make connections. Based upon my learning objective, I would say I was competent.
I discussed the history of education and showed how it impacted education
today, but I still need to work on taking it the next step and discussing what
the future would look like. My final grade on my final was 107/100 (extra
credit). The difference was not just stating random dates and events, but
connecting history to my responses. When I compared my midterm to my final, I
could see a difference and could tell why I did not do well in my midterm.
Freshman
Year Experience Presentation
Description:
This first semester in the MSHE program has made me
aware of the different functional area that student affairs consist and how I
could get involved. One of our assignments in our class was to choose a
functional area of your choice and with partner do research, create a handout,
and do a 30 minute presentation. Our presentation had to focus on history,
functional area, student development theories, current issues, funding and
perception.
Semester:
Fall 2011
Learning
Domains: Education
Learning
Outcome:
SWiBAT:
identify 2 similarities or difference between the community college and
four- year public First Year Experience (FYE)
SWiBAT: identify and apply one student development
theory to First Year Experience (FYE)
Assessment
Rubric
Advanced
|
Competent
|
Basic
|
Needs
Improvement
|
|
SLO
#1
|
Identified
2 similarities or differences between the community college, four-year public
AND private institutions for FYE
|
Identified
2 similarities or difference between the community college and four- year
public institution for FYE
|
Identified
1 similarity or difference between community colleges and four-year
institution for FYE
|
Did
not identify any similarities or differences
|
SLO
#2
|
Identified
and applied more than one student development theory to FYE
|
Identified
and applied one student development theory to FYE
|
Identified
one student development theory to FYE
|
Did
not identify and apply any student development theory to FYE
|
Evidence:
Reflection:
Since student affairs
are new to me, I am not sure at this time what area I want to work in. Based
upon my experience as an undergraduate at Arizona State University, I was
involved in First Year Experience (FYE) as a freshman student, peer mentor and after
graduation a facilitator. At the time, I did not know anything about Student
Affairs, let alone you could go to school and attain a degree in Student
Affairs.
As my classmate George
began to do research to prepare for our presentation, I was able to gain a better
understanding of the functional area First Year Experience. I met with Dr.
Nancy Fernandez, director of Freshman Programs at California State University,
Fullerton. Before I met with Dr. Fernandez, I was entering the meeting with
what I knew from my experience at Arizona State University. At the time, I
though all First Year Experience program were the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment